NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND vs CHINESE STYLE SWEET-&-TANGY DIPPING SAUCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND: 5
vs
CHINESE STYLE SWEET-&-TANGY DIPPING SAUCE: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND | CHINESE STYLE SWEET-&-TANGY DIPPING SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 267 cal | 216 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 40 g | 59.5 g | |
| Fat | 10 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND | CHINESE STYLE SWEET-&-TANGY DIPPING SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND | CHINESE STYLE SWEET-&-TANGY DIPPING SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 200 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,933 MG | 30 MG |