NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND vs CHICKEN SAUCE SANDWICH
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND: 6
vs
CHICKEN SAUCE SANDWICH: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND | CHICKEN SAUCE SANDWICH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 267 cal | 600 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 40 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 10 g | 53.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND | CHICKEN SAUCE SANDWICH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND | CHICKEN SAUCE SANDWICH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 200 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 13 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,933 MG | 500 MG |