MRS. PAUL'S vs WILD CAUGHT COLD WATER WHOLE COOKED LOBSTERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT COLD WATER WHOLE COOKED LOBSTERS wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
MRS. PAUL'S: 3
vs
WILD CAUGHT COLD WATER WHOLE COOKED LOBSTERS: 7
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MRS. PAUL'S | WILD CAUGHT COLD WATER WHOLE COOKED LOBSTERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 184 cal | 95 cal | |
| Protein | 12.1 g | 19.1 g | |
| Carbs | 27.0 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 3.2 g | 0.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MRS. PAUL'S | WILD CAUGHT COLD WATER WHOLE COOKED LOBSTERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0.9 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | MRS. PAUL'S | WILD CAUGHT COLD WATER WHOLE COOKED LOBSTERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 14 MG | 98 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 238 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 326 MG | 488 MG |