MISO PORK RAMEN vs CHINESE-STYLE KUNGPAO WITH COOKED HOKKIEN NOODLES HOT & TANGY SAUCE WITH BOK CHOY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHINESE-STYLE KUNGPAO WITH COOKED HOKKIEN NOODLES HOT & TANGY SAUCE WITH BOK CHOY wins in 8 out of 10 nutrient categories
MISO PORK RAMEN: 1
vs
CHINESE-STYLE KUNGPAO WITH COOKED HOKKIEN NOODLES HOT & TANGY SAUCE WITH BOK CHOY: 8
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MISO PORK RAMEN | CHINESE-STYLE KUNGPAO WITH COOKED HOKKIEN NOODLES HOT & TANGY SAUCE WITH BOK CHOY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 266 cal | 191 cal | |
| Protein | 4.7 g | 5.8 g | |
| Carbs | 57.8 g | 34.4 g | |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MISO PORK RAMEN | CHINESE-STYLE KUNGPAO WITH COOKED HOKKIEN NOODLES HOT & TANGY SAUCE WITH BOK CHOY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 2 MG | 21 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 75 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 39 MG | 336 MG |