MILK CHOCOLATE WITH A SALTED CARAMEL FILLING vs BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
MILK CHOCOLATE WITH A SALTED CARAMEL FILLING: 2
vs
BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE: 7
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MILK CHOCOLATE WITH A SALTED CARAMEL FILLING | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 487 cal | 485 cal | |
| Protein | 5.1 g | 9.1 g | |
| Carbs | 61.5 g | 60.6 g | |
| Fat | 28.2 g | 24.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 9.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MILK CHOCOLATE WITH A SALTED CARAMEL FILLING | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 3.6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | MILK CHOCOLATE WITH A SALTED CARAMEL FILLING | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 154 MG | 61 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 4.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 333 MG | 136 MG |