MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER: 5
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 60.7 g | |
| Fat | 23.3 g | 16.1 g | |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 100 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 200 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 217 MG | 196 MG |