MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS vs CALIFORNIA ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CALIFORNIA ALMONDS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS: 3
vs
CALIFORNIA ALMONDS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | CALIFORNIA ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 533 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fat | 36.7 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 10.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | CALIFORNIA ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | CALIFORNIA ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 133 MG | 250 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 233 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 33 MG | 286 MG |