MILK CHOCOLATE COATED HAZELNUTS vs EMERALD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
EMERALD wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
MILK CHOCOLATE COATED HAZELNUTS: 2
vs
EMERALD: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MILK CHOCOLATE COATED HAZELNUTS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 571 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 17.1 g | |
| Carbs | 39.3 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fat | 46.4 g | 45.7 g | |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 2.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MILK CHOCOLATE COATED HAZELNUTS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MILK CHOCOLATE COATED HAZELNUTS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 57 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 5.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 375 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 571 MG |