MILDLY SWEET BAVARIAN vs SABLE & ROSENFELD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SABLE & ROSENFELD wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
MILDLY SWEET BAVARIAN: 1
vs
SABLE & ROSENFELD: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MILDLY SWEET BAVARIAN | SABLE & ROSENFELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 33 cal | 33 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.3 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 3.3 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MILDLY SWEET BAVARIAN | SABLE & ROSENFELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 33.3 MG | 4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | MILDLY SWEET BAVARIAN | SABLE & ROSENFELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 133 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 533 MG | 1,500 MG |