MILD PORK ITALIAN SAUSAGE vs HATFIELD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MILD PORK ITALIAN SAUSAGE wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
MILD PORK ITALIAN SAUSAGE: 6
vs
HATFIELD: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MILD PORK ITALIAN SAUSAGE | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 357 cal | 321 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 10.7 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 30.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MILD PORK ITALIAN SAUSAGE | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MILD PORK ITALIAN SAUSAGE | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 393 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 821 MG | 625 MG |