MILD MAJOR GREY CHUTNEY vs SABLE & ROSENFELD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SABLE & ROSENFELD wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
MILD MAJOR GREY CHUTNEY: 3
vs
SABLE & ROSENFELD: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MILD MAJOR GREY CHUTNEY | SABLE & ROSENFELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 237 cal | 435 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 4.4 g | |
| Carbs | 57.9 g | 13.0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 43.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 4.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MILD MAJOR GREY CHUTNEY | SABLE & ROSENFELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MILD MAJOR GREY CHUTNEY | SABLE & ROSENFELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 87 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,316 MG | 304 MG |