MIKO BRAND vs ORGANIC TAMARIND PASTE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MIKO BRAND wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
MIKO BRAND: 5
vs
ORGANIC TAMARIND PASTE: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MIKO BRAND | ORGANIC TAMARIND PASTE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 222 cal | 200 cal | |
| Protein | 11.1 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 38.9 g | 80 g | |
| Fat | 5.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 20 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MIKO BRAND | ORGANIC TAMARIND PASTE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MIKO BRAND | ORGANIC TAMARIND PASTE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 111 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 2,389 MG | 0 MG |