MICROWAVEABLE ORGANIC SWEET POTATOES vs OLD FASHIONED COLE SLAW
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
OLD FASHIONED COLE SLAW wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
MICROWAVEABLE ORGANIC SWEET POTATOES: 3
vs
OLD FASHIONED COLE SLAW: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MICROWAVEABLE ORGANIC SWEET POTATOES | OLD FASHIONED COLE SLAW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 111 cal | 29 cal | |
| Protein | 1.7 g | 1.2 g | |
| Carbs | 22.2 g | 5.9 g | |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 2.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MICROWAVEABLE ORGANIC SWEET POTATOES | OLD FASHIONED COLE SLAW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 7.7 MG | 42.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | MICROWAVEABLE ORGANIC SWEET POTATOES | OLD FASHIONED COLE SLAW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 34 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 205 MG | 29 MG |