MICROWAVE PORK RINDS vs ORIGINAL QUINOA CURLS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MICROWAVE PORK RINDS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
MICROWAVE PORK RINDS: 5
vs
ORIGINAL QUINOA CURLS: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MICROWAVE PORK RINDS | ORIGINAL QUINOA CURLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 71.4 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 53.6 g | |
| Fat | 14.3 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MICROWAVE PORK RINDS | ORIGINAL QUINOA CURLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 54 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 1,143 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 2,214 MG | 679 MG |