MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE vs MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAMS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAMS wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE: 2
vs
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAMS: 7
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 381 cal | 474 cal | |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 5.3 g | |
| Carbs | 76.2 g | 65.8 g | |
| Fat | 8.3 g | 23.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 6.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 105 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 36 MG | 276 MG |