MARCUS vs CULTURED REDUCED FAT BUTTERMILK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARCUS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
MARCUS: 5
vs
CULTURED REDUCED FAT BUTTERMILK: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MARCUS | CULTURED REDUCED FAT BUTTERMILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 46 cal | 50 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.8 g | |
| Carbs | 5.4 g | 5.8 g | |
| Fat | 1.0 g | 1.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MARCUS | CULTURED REDUCED FAT BUTTERMILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | MARCUS | CULTURED REDUCED FAT BUTTERMILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 146 MG | 15 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 185 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 52 MG | 121 MG |