MAPLE HAM vs GREEN CHILE CHEDD'R SAUSAGE PLANT-BASED LINKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MAPLE HAM wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
MAPLE HAM: 5
vs
GREEN CHILE CHEDD'R SAUSAGE PLANT-BASED LINKS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MAPLE HAM | GREEN CHILE CHEDD'R SAUSAGE PLANT-BASED LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 125 cal | 174 cal | |
| Protein | 19.6 g | 14.1 g | |
| Carbs | 5.4 g | 8.7 g | |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 9.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MAPLE HAM | GREEN CHILE CHEDD'R SAUSAGE PLANT-BASED LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MAPLE HAM | GREEN CHILE CHEDD'R SAUSAGE PLANT-BASED LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 228 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 2.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 652 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 696 MG | 478 MG |