MAPLE FUDGE vs OATMEAL OLD FASHIONED COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MAPLE FUDGE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
MAPLE FUDGE: 5
vs
OATMEAL OLD FASHIONED COOKIES: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MAPLE FUDGE | OATMEAL OLD FASHIONED COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 469 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 6.3 g | |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 71.9 g | |
| Fat | 15 g | 18.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MAPLE FUDGE | OATMEAL OLD FASHIONED COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MAPLE FUDGE | OATMEAL OLD FASHIONED COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 90 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 70 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 167 MG | 531 MG |