MAPLE BACON BAKED BEANS vs GARBANZO ORGANIC LOW SODIUM BEANS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GARBANZO ORGANIC LOW SODIUM BEANS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
MAPLE BACON BAKED BEANS: 4
vs
GARBANZO ORGANIC LOW SODIUM BEANS: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MAPLE BACON BAKED BEANS | GARBANZO ORGANIC LOW SODIUM BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 115 cal | 131 cal | |
| Protein | 4.6 g | 7.7 g | |
| Carbs | 22.3 g | 15.4 g | |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 3.8 g | 6.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MAPLE BACON BAKED BEANS | GARBANZO ORGANIC LOW SODIUM BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0.9 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | MAPLE BACON BAKED BEANS | GARBANZO ORGANIC LOW SODIUM BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 46 MG | 62 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 431 MG | 81 MG |