MACKEREL IN WATER vs WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MACKEREL IN WATER wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
MACKEREL IN WATER: 4
vs
WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MACKEREL IN WATER | WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 190 cal | 118 cal | |
| Protein | 21 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 11 g | 4.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MACKEREL IN WATER | WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MACKEREL IN WATER | WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 250 MG | 235 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 329 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 340 MG | 306 MG |