MACKEREL IN BRINE vs WILD ALASKAN PINK SALMON FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MACKEREL IN BRINE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
MACKEREL IN BRINE: 5
vs
WILD ALASKAN PINK SALMON FILLET: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MACKEREL IN BRINE | WILD ALASKAN PINK SALMON FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 161 cal | 143 cal | |
| Protein | 23.2 g | 19.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 7.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MACKEREL IN BRINE | WILD ALASKAN PINK SALMON FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MACKEREL IN BRINE | WILD ALASKAN PINK SALMON FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 446 MG | 159 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 500 MG | 429 MG |