MACADAMIA COOKIES vs FUDGE GRAHAM COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FUDGE GRAHAM COOKIES wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
MACADAMIA COOKIES: 3
vs
FUDGE GRAHAM COOKIES: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MACADAMIA COOKIES | FUDGE GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 340 cal | 478 cal | |
| Protein | 4 g | 4.4 g | |
| Carbs | 46 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 22 g | 21.7 g | |
| Fiber | 2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MACADAMIA COOKIES | FUDGE GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | MACADAMIA COOKIES | FUDGE GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 40 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 3.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 250 MG | 304 MG |