LUNDS & BYERLYS vs ICED OATMEAL COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 6
vs
ICED OATMEAL COOKIES: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | ICED OATMEAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 397 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 5.2 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 60.3 g | 71.4 g | |
| Fat | 13.8 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | ICED OATMEAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | ICED OATMEAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 69 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 107 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 483 MG | 375 MG |