LUNDS & BYERLYS vs DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 4
vs
DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 533 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 10 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 45 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fat | 20 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 5 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 50 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 233 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 75 MG | 0 MG |