LUNDS & BYERLYS vs GRILLED CHICKEN CAESAR SALAD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GRILLED CHICKEN CAESAR SALAD wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 4
vs
GRILLED CHICKEN CAESAR SALAD: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | GRILLED CHICKEN CAESAR SALAD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 198 cal | 245 cal | |
| Protein | 11.3 g | 14.8 g | |
| Carbs | 8.5 g | 7.4 g | |
| Fat | 14.1 g | 18.1 g | |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 0.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | GRILLED CHICKEN CAESAR SALAD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 48.8 MG | 2.8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | GRILLED CHICKEN CAESAR SALAD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 177 MG | 208 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 339 MG | 551 MG |