LUNDS & BYERLYS vs UNSALTED WHOLE ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 7
vs
UNSALTED WHOLE ALMONDS: 2
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | UNSALTED WHOLE ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 526 cal | 607 cal | |
| Protein | 33.3 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 14.0 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fat | 42.1 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 14.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | UNSALTED WHOLE ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | UNSALTED WHOLE ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 286 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 14.8 MG | 3.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 579 MG | 0 MG |