LUNDS & BYERLYS vs MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAMS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 5
vs
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAMS: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 411 cal | 474 cal | |
| Protein | 8.9 g | 5.3 g | |
| Carbs | 53.6 g | 65.8 g | |
| Fat | 19.6 g | 23.7 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 2.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 6.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 105 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 268 MG | 276 MG |