LUNDS & BYERLYS vs OATMEAL RAISIN COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 5
vs
OATMEAL RAISIN COOKIES: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | OATMEAL RAISIN COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 444 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 5.6 g | |
| Carbs | 57.1 g | 66.7 g | |
| Fat | 14.3 g | 19.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 5.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | OATMEAL RAISIN COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | OATMEAL RAISIN COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 33 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 222 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 286 MG | 278 MG |