LUNDS & BYERLYS vs VIRGINIA HAM AND CHEDDAR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 5
vs
VIRGINIA HAM AND CHEDDAR: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | VIRGINIA HAM AND CHEDDAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 212 cal | 260 cal | |
| Protein | 10.2 g | 15.6 g | |
| Carbs | 24.7 g | 27.3 g | |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 10.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | VIRGINIA HAM AND CHEDDAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | VIRGINIA HAM AND CHEDDAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 181 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 592 MG | 675 MG |