LUNDS & BYERLYS vs TRIANGLE ON WHEAT
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRIANGLE ON WHEAT wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 3
vs
TRIANGLE ON WHEAT: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | TRIANGLE ON WHEAT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 235 cal | 233 cal | |
| Protein | 10.8 g | 11.3 g | |
| Carbs | 21.1 g | 22 g | |
| Fat | 11.7 g | 11.3 g | |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 0.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | TRIANGLE ON WHEAT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.8 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | TRIANGLE ON WHEAT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 28 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 427 MG | 893 MG |