LUNDS & BYERLYS vs MACADAMIA NUTS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 6
vs
MACADAMIA NUTS: 3
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | MACADAMIA NUTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 536 cal | 633 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 46.4 g | 40 g | |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | MACADAMIA NUTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | MACADAMIA NUTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5.1 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 214 MG | 83 MG |