LUNDS & BYERLYS vs CINNAMON GLAZED ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CINNAMON GLAZED ALMONDS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 4
vs
CINNAMON GLAZED ALMONDS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | CINNAMON GLAZED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 600 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 23.3 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 20 g | 53.6 g | |
| Fat | 50 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 10 g | 7.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | CINNAMON GLAZED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | CINNAMON GLAZED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 125 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 314 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 304 MG |