LUNDS & BYERLYS vs SLICED ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLICED ALMONDS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 4
vs
SLICED ALMONDS: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | SLICED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 533 cal | 575 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 56.7 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fat | 30 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 10.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | SLICED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | SLICED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 100 MG | 250 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 3.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 750 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 67 MG | 0 MG |