LUNDS & BYERLYS vs RUSTIC EUROPEAN STONE-HEARTH BREADS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RUSTIC EUROPEAN STONE-HEARTH BREADS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 1
vs
RUSTIC EUROPEAN STONE-HEARTH BREADS: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | RUSTIC EUROPEAN STONE-HEARTH BREADS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 263 cal | 263 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 7.0 g | 8.8 g | |
| Carbs | 47.4 g | 54.4 g | |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 3.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | RUSTIC EUROPEAN STONE-HEARTH BREADS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | RUSTIC EUROPEAN STONE-HEARTH BREADS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 3.2 MG | 3.2 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 509 MG | 649 MG |