LUNCHEON MEAT vs CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
LUNCHEON MEAT: 3
vs
CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNCHEON MEAT | CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 321 cal | 161 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 12.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNCHEON MEAT | CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNCHEON MEAT | CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,411 MG | 268 MG |