LUNCH TO-GO CHUNK LIGHT IN WATER TUNA vs BASMATI 90 SECOND RICE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNCH TO-GO CHUNK LIGHT IN WATER TUNA wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
LUNCH TO-GO CHUNK LIGHT IN WATER TUNA: 7
vs
BASMATI 90 SECOND RICE: 3
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNCH TO-GO CHUNK LIGHT IN WATER TUNA | BASMATI 90 SECOND RICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 224 cal | 112 cal | |
| Protein | 16.4 g | 2.1 g | |
| Carbs | 21.6 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 7.8 g | 1.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNCH TO-GO CHUNK LIGHT IN WATER TUNA | BASMATI 90 SECOND RICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 1 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNCH TO-GO CHUNK LIGHT IN WATER TUNA | BASMATI 90 SECOND RICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 52 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 207 MG | 25 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 552 MG | 44 MG |