LOW SODIUM ALMONDS vs CHOCOLATE COVERED MACADAMIAS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LOW SODIUM ALMONDS wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
LOW SODIUM ALMONDS: 7
vs
CHOCOLATE COVERED MACADAMIAS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LOW SODIUM ALMONDS | CHOCOLATE COVERED MACADAMIAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 607 cal | 575 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 7.5 g | |
| Carbs | 17.9 g | 55 g | |
| Fat | 46.4 g | 37.5 g | |
| Fiber | 10.7 g | 2.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LOW SODIUM ALMONDS | CHOCOLATE COVERED MACADAMIAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LOW SODIUM ALMONDS | CHOCOLATE COVERED MACADAMIAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 286 MG | 100 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.9 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 679 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 179 MG | 50 MG |