LOW FAT RICOTTA vs COLBY JACK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COLBY JACK wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
LOW FAT RICOTTA: 3
vs
COLBY JACK: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LOW FAT RICOTTA | COLBY JACK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 97 cal | 393 cal | |
| Protein | 9.7 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 6.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 4.0 g | 32.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LOW FAT RICOTTA | COLBY JACK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LOW FAT RICOTTA | COLBY JACK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 177 MG | 536 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 258 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 258 MG | 607 MG |