LOADED BAKED POTATO CRUSTED ALASKA POLLOCK FISH FILLETS vs WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
LOADED BAKED POTATO CRUSTED ALASKA POLLOCK FISH FILLETS: 5
vs
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LOADED BAKED POTATO CRUSTED ALASKA POLLOCK FISH FILLETS | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 220 cal | 86 cal | |
| Protein | 12.2 g | 19.2 g | |
| Carbs | 21.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 9.8 g | 0.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LOADED BAKED POTATO CRUSTED ALASKA POLLOCK FISH FILLETS | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LOADED BAKED POTATO CRUSTED ALASKA POLLOCK FISH FILLETS | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 15 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 233 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 431 MG | 132 MG |