LOADED BAKED POTATO CRUSTED ALASKA POLLOCK FISH FILLETS vs WILD CAUGHT FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT FILLETS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
LOADED BAKED POTATO CRUSTED ALASKA POLLOCK FISH FILLETS: 3
vs
WILD CAUGHT FILLETS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LOADED BAKED POTATO CRUSTED ALASKA POLLOCK FISH FILLETS | WILD CAUGHT FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 220 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 12.2 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 21.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 9.8 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LOADED BAKED POTATO CRUSTED ALASKA POLLOCK FISH FILLETS | WILD CAUGHT FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LOADED BAKED POTATO CRUSTED ALASKA POLLOCK FISH FILLETS | WILD CAUGHT FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 15 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 233 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 431 MG | 482 MG |