LOADED BAKED POTATO AGED SHARP CHEDDAR vs FROZEN COOKED WHOLE WHITE CLAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FROZEN COOKED WHOLE WHITE CLAM wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
LOADED BAKED POTATO AGED SHARP CHEDDAR: 3
vs
FROZEN COOKED WHOLE WHITE CLAM: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LOADED BAKED POTATO AGED SHARP CHEDDAR | FROZEN COOKED WHOLE WHITE CLAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 184 cal | 133 cal | |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 20.4 g | |
| Carbs | 28.3 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 5.9 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LOADED BAKED POTATO AGED SHARP CHEDDAR | FROZEN COOKED WHOLE WHITE CLAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LOADED BAKED POTATO AGED SHARP CHEDDAR | FROZEN COOKED WHOLE WHITE CLAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 39 MG | 88 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 6.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 171 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 414 MG | 115 MG |