LIGHT STANDARD CAPTAIN KIM TUNA vs WILD ALASKA SOCKEYE SMOKED SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD ALASKA SOCKEYE SMOKED SALMON wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
LIGHT STANDARD CAPTAIN KIM TUNA: 1
vs
WILD ALASKA SOCKEYE SMOKED SALMON: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LIGHT STANDARD CAPTAIN KIM TUNA | WILD ALASKA SOCKEYE SMOKED SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 223 cal | 161 cal | |
| Protein | 19.6 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 16.1 g | 8.0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LIGHT STANDARD CAPTAIN KIM TUNA | WILD ALASKA SOCKEYE SMOKED SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LIGHT STANDARD CAPTAIN KIM TUNA | WILD ALASKA SOCKEYE SMOKED SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 411 MG | 1,089 MG |