LEE KUM KEE vs BURMAN'S
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LEE KUM KEE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
LEE KUM KEE: 5
vs
BURMAN'S: 0
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LEE KUM KEE | BURMAN'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 100 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 13.3 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 30 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LEE KUM KEE | BURMAN'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LEE KUM KEE | BURMAN'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 6,867 MG | 600 MG |