LAURA LYNN vs RICOTTA PART SKIM CHEESE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LAURA LYNN wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
LAURA LYNN: 4
vs
RICOTTA PART SKIM CHEESE: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LAURA LYNN | RICOTTA PART SKIM CHEESE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 381 cal | 145 cal | |
| Protein | 23.8 g | 9.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.2 g | |
| Fat | 33.3 g | 9.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LAURA LYNN | RICOTTA PART SKIM CHEESE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LAURA LYNN | RICOTTA PART SKIM CHEESE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 714 MG | 403 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 667 MG | 129 MG |