LANCE vs OATMEAL SOFT & CHEWY COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LANCE wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
LANCE: 4
vs
OATMEAL SOFT & CHEWY COOKIES: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LANCE | OATMEAL SOFT & CHEWY COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 480 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 4 g | |
| Carbs | 67.9 g | 60 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 28 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LANCE | OATMEAL SOFT & CHEWY COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LANCE | OATMEAL SOFT & CHEWY COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 429 MG | 280 MG |