LANCE vs FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
LANCE: 4
vs
FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LANCE | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 472 cal | 448 cal | |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 69.2 g | 69.0 g | |
| Fat | 18.9 g | 17.2 g | |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 3.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LANCE | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LANCE | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 63 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.5 MG | 3.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 393 MG | 172 MG |