LANCE vs NATURAL DECADENCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LANCE wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
LANCE: 4
vs
NATURAL DECADENCE: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LANCE | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 468 cal | 393 cal | |
| Protein | 6.4 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 72.3 g | 71.4 g | |
| Fat | 17.0 g | 8.9 g | |
| Fiber | 4.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LANCE | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LANCE | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 5.7 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 511 MG | 232 MG |