KUM & GO vs MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
KUM & GO wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
KUM & GO: 5
vs
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | KUM & GO | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 444 cal | 525 cal | |
| Protein | 11.1 g | 7.5 g | |
| Carbs | 51.9 g | 55 g | |
| Fat | 25.9 g | 32.5 g | |
| Fiber | 3.7 g | 5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | KUM & GO | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | KUM & GO | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 150 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 185 MG | 38 MG |