KIRKLAND SIGNATURE vs BONELESS SKINLESS CHICKEN BREAST FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
KIRKLAND SIGNATURE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
KIRKLAND SIGNATURE: 5
vs
BONELESS SKINLESS CHICKEN BREAST FILLETS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | KIRKLAND SIGNATURE | BONELESS SKINLESS CHICKEN BREAST FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 106 cal | |
| Protein | 23.2 g | 20.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 2.4 g | |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 1.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | KIRKLAND SIGNATURE | BONELESS SKINLESS CHICKEN BREAST FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.1 MG | 0.7 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | KIRKLAND SIGNATURE | BONELESS SKINLESS CHICKEN BREAST FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 12 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.6 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 67 MG | 424 MG |