KINGS vs FANNIE MAY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
KINGS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
KINGS: 5
vs
FANNIE MAY: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | KINGS | FANNIE MAY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 567 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 26.7 g | 10 g | |
| Carbs | 16.7 g | 60 g | |
| Fat | 50 g | 27.5 g | |
| Fiber | 10 g | 5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | KINGS | FANNIE MAY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | KINGS | FANNIE MAY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 133 MG | 100 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 433 MG | 475 MG |